R1 and R2 are ASBRs in the same area, each with an equal cost external path to the same external network prefix. R1 advertises an external route into OSPF with a Type 1 metric. R2 advertises an external route into OSPF with a Type 2 metric. Which route would be preferred?
A. R1's route is preferred because Type 1 metrics take into account the external cost only.
B. R1's route is preferred because Type 1 metrics take into account the internal and external cost.
C. R2's route is preferred because Type 2 metrics take into account the internal and external cost.
D. R2's route is preferred because Type 2 metrics take into account the external cost only.
Answer: D
-- Exhibit --
user@router>show route advertising-protocol bgp 172.16.36.1
inet.0: 31 destinations, 31 routes (31 active, 0 holddown, 0 hidden)
Prefix Nexthop MED Lclpref ASpath
* 10.200.17.0/24 Self I
* 10.200.19.0/24 Self I
-- Exhibit --
Click the Exhibit button.
Referring to the exhibit, which three actions would summarize these routes to a BGP peer? (Choose three.)
A. Create a policy that accepts the more specific contributing routes.
B. Create a route to 10.200.16.0/21 with a next hop of 172.16.36.1 under the [edit routing-options static] hierarchy.
C. Create a policy that rejects the more specific contributing routes.
D. Create a policy to accept aggregate routes.
E. Create a 10.200.16.0/22 route under the [edit routing-options aggregate] hierarchy.
Answer: CDE
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.